Re: [cc65] ca65 as crosscompiler

From: Christian Groessler <chris1groessler.org>
Date: 2013-10-16 17:06:04
On 10/14/13 14:24, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> At the time, when I built this into ca65, there was no "optional" keyword for
> the segment definition in the linker config. Without this, one would always
> get warnings for C programs that didn't have all segments. The easiest
> solution at that time was to always add empty default segments when the
> assembler wrote the object file.
>
> Today, it would be possible to remove the empty segments from the object file
> and mark the segments as "optional" in the linker config. But on the othr
> side, the empty segments won't harm.


Ok. Thanks.

They don't harm but they might cause confusion (as they did to me :-)).

regards,
chris

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Wed Oct 16 17:06:16 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2013-10-16 17:06:18 CEST