Re: [cc65] size of .enum?

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <>
Date: 2013-03-31 18:50:09
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 04:57:36PM +0200, wrote:

> Definitely! It looks much better. But my problem with this approach is that
> it is not DRY, which is what I am always aiming at. Especially when codebase
> is far from being stable and is very likely to be changed multiple times soon.

Well, it's your decision. In my eyes it's a very modular approach with
interface and implementation clearly separated.

> I placed
> file = ""
> in the linker config but now I checked and didn't notice any difference in
> the final executable size with and without this "file" attribute.

Yes, you're right. Type "zp" is actually a bss type, so it's not written to
the output anyway. Using an empty file name is unnecessary.



Ullrich von Bassewitz                        
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sun Mar 31 18:50:15 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2013-06-15 17:37:38 CEST