Re: [cc65] size of .enum?

From: <>
Date: 2013-04-02 11:38:18
On 2013-04-02, at 11:28, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:

>> I see. I am wondering if I don't get better out with getting back to
>> defining all the variables' addresses as constants.. I would then only have to
>> know the value of the last one (first one is known).
> That's of course your decision. ca65 doesn't enforce one specific coding
> style.

That's what I so much appreciate in the cc65/ca65 package: the versatility, which combined with the linker goes well beyond alternatives.

OK. I shall have to think whether I can come up with something smart enough regarding the constants, so that I can always have the right number and the ease of modifying the variable set.

To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Tue Apr 2 11:38:32 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2013-06-15 17:37:38 CEST